http://napodano.com/lb?id=21 sounding different since 1993 This is my music. I have started composing on 1993 using StarTrekker on Commodore Amiga, then switched to FastTracker 1 on PC, then FastTracker 2 and now I am using Renoise. This is my music. I have started composing on 1993 using StarTrekker on Commodore Amiga, then switched to FastTracker 1 on PC, then FastTracker 2 and now I am using Renoise. en-gb (C)2009 Fabio Napodano, distributed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/" target=_BLANK">Creative Commons</a> license. Fabio Napodano napodano@napodano.com napodano@napodano.com (Fabio Napodano) Fabio Napodano http://napodano.com/lb/audio/rssimage.jpg http://napodano.com/lb Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:36:30 +0200 Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:20:00 +0100 Loudblog no Music Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:20:00 +0100 http://napodano.com/lb/index.php?id=21 http://napodano.com/lb/index.php?id=21 napodano napodano no http://napodano.com/lb/index.php?id=21#comments last.fm music streaming last.fm has announced that, since March the 30th, its radio streaming service will require a subscription fee of 3€/£/$ per month. I’m not against pay sites; I acknowledge that running a site such as last.fm costs money and these money last.fm has announced that, since March the 30th, its radio streaming service will require a subscription fee of 3€/£/$ per month. I’m not against pay sites; I acknowledge that running a site such as last.fm costs money and these money cannot be refund through advertising only, but what really bothers me is the fact that users from USA, UK and Germany will still not require paying, because in these 3 nations last.fm already pays its bills back through advertising and current subscriptions. this idea is completely wrong in my opinion, discriminating and senseless. A couple of better ideas would be: a) let EVERYONE pay, and pay less (as low as 2€/month or 20€/year) b) give the option to buy what you use, through pre-sold straming “packets” of 1,000 songs, for those people who do not make regular usage of last.fm radio. <p>last.fm <a href="http://blog.last.fm/category/Announcements/">has announced</a> that, since March the 30th, its radio streaming service will require a subscription fee of 3&#8364;/&#163;/$ per month.</p> <p>I&#8217;m not against pay sites; I acknowledge that running a site such as last.fm costs money and these money cannot be refund through advertising only, but what really bothers me is the fact that users from USA, UK and Germany will still not require paying, because in these 3 nations last.fm already pays its bills back through advertising and current subscriptions.</p> <p>this idea is completely wrong in my opinion, discriminating and senseless.</p> <p>A couple of better ideas would be:<br /> a) let EVERYONE pay, and pay less (as low as 2&#8364;/month or 20&#8364;/year)<br /> b) give the option to buy what you use, through pre-sold straming &#8220;packets&#8221; of 1,000 songs, for those people who do not make regular usage of last.fm radio.</p><ul> <li> <a href="http://blog.last.fm/category/Announcements/" title="read last.fm announcement">last.fm announcement</a> :: read last.fm announcement</a> </li> </ul>